About Me

Name: The Ice Princess
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY-Wake up!

   Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY 

You really need to read this about who is who in politics. It can open your eyes to who the TRUE civil rights champions are:
                                       

John Quincy Adams was called the hell-hound of abolition. He wanted slavery abolished. Meanwhile those who would later become Democrats fought hard to keep it legal. MOST of our founding fathers, even those who held slaves were abolitionists eventually. As early as 1789, they were fighting to have it abolished.

In 1854 the Democratic controlled Congress fought and passed a law expanding slavery called the Kansas-Nebraska act. This led to contention in our government and caused a split of the Democratic-Republican Party. One side- the Democrats fought hard to pass legislation to keep and expand slavery. Our Republicans fought harder to abolish it.

These things led Lincoln to take us to war, for the sake of abolishing the evil practice of slavery completely. The Democrats went on to fight AGAINST every civil rights legislation which we (the Republicans) fought hard to pass.

The 1864 Republican Platform gives us both reason and right as a party to drill for oil, since OPEC forces people into slavery. We should have NO MORE TO DO WITH THEM. It speaks of how the Republican government finds it detestable and shall not partake in anything advocating it. The Democrats platform just complains about the Republicans using the military to uphold fair elections, to keep pro-slavery (Democrats) people from acting out violently against those who oppose it (Republicans).

In 1868 the Democrats Platform actually accuses Republicans of fighting for "Negro supremacy" and they promised to fight against any further civil rights for blacks. The Republicans just declared sympathy for the opressed.

In 1872 the platforms- the Dems demanded amnesty to protect them from prosecution for the crimes against humanity perpetrated in the civil war. The Republicans platform was to emancipate 4 million slaves, give them citizenship and voting rights. In 1872- 87% of the Democrats voted against an equal education Bill for black Americans.

In 1876 the Democrats' platform was calling the Republicans unfair for fighting for the rights of blacks and they claim that it is NOT a majority in America that wanted their freedom. The Republicans' platform promised to purge the US of slavery and to fight for civil rights for blacks.

In 1880 the Republicans were sending military people to the places people voted to assure the safety of blacks who were trying to vote. The Democrats called it corruption?? Again the Republican platform spoke out against slavery.

In 1884 the Democrats of the South found a new way to be unfair to the blacks by creating the "Black Code" and only allowing them to partake in servile labor, making them less than a white man. The Republicans fought against this and tried to abolish the Black Code.

1888 and 1892 - The Republicans stay on track and promise to fight FOR equal rights. In 1892 the Democrats made basic proclamations of change, which were later evidenced as untrue.

In 1896 the Republican Party platform took a stand against lynching, which was still going on, despite the Republicans efforts to stop unequal treatment. The Democrats came out with a not so new civil rights cause- freedom of religion (already covered in the Constitution). It was later taken further to mean freedom FROM religion and morphed into a lie about the meaning of the Constitution (the false claims of Separation of Church and State).

In 1900 The Republican Party platform pertained to the 15th Amendment- against discrimination. The Democrats said nothing about civil rights that year, same as 1888. However, the years they said something- it was against civil rights.

In 1904, The Democrats' platform claimed that all racial inequality was healed at that point. WHAT?? The Republicans disagreed and demanded fair representation, so they could continue to fight for those rights.

From 1908-1936 The Democrats' platform made NO mention of race or civil rights. The Republicans came out again to fight for equal rights for blacks in 1908, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1932 and 1936. They also continued to try to pass legislation to stop the lynching in 1920, 1924 and 1928. Democrats at that time were against stiff criminal penalties for lynching and there was equal protection for a dog. In 1936 the Republicans were trying to pass laws for fair employment and safety rights for black Americans.

In 1940, Roosevelt, a Democrat pandered to black Americans and appointed blacks to his cabinet to advise him on race issues. Although, he did little for civil rights and didn't even introduce ONE civil rights Bill during his presidency. This was the start of the BIG LIE, where the Democrats showed themselves to be pro-civil-rights and actually did nothing for minorities. In 1940, The Republican platform was to promise a square deal and to enact civil service reform, making the military unbiased towards blacks.

The 1944 platforms were:
The Democrats made
a vague promise of civil rights for people of racial and religious minority. This would later have Democrats inferring to blacks that they are the same as people of quirky and sick religions, even Satanism. It was made to sound like they would lose their rights if they didn’t take a stand for these quirky civil rights causes being pandered by the liberals and it continues today with abortion and gay marriage. The Republicans were still fighting to get the Democrats to agree with them on legislation to penalize racists for lynching. Ironically, the Democrats at this time were coming out as THE party for civil rights, yet enacting no good legislation to protect blacks. The Republicans were still fighting AGAINST discrimination, segregation and unfair treatment of blacks, despite the liberals manipulating them into becoming Democrats every chance they got. Government had been making people pay a poll tax, so they could vote. With the state of the economy for blacks, thanks to the Democrats killing the legislation Republicans tried to pass, most blacks could not afford to vote. Republicans wanted to make voting EQUAL for ALL classes and possible for all blacks, so they tried to abolish the poll tax.

In 1948 the Democrats under Truman finally listened to the REPUBLICANS and enacted an anti-lynching law. The Republicans had tried and failed for decades, because of the Democrats in office. Truman also finally abolished the poll tax (for Federal elections) that Republicans were trying to abolish. Despite almost all of this new legislation being legislation the Republicans had been trying to pass for decades and being stonewalled by the Democrats, the Democrats still got credit for it. Again the Republicans platform was to protect civil rights and abolish segregation. Therefore, despite many Democrats voting against the new civil rights laws, these things were finally passed because of the Republicans voting for them.

In 1952 The Democrats platform was a very basic statement about upholding rights. The Republicans made a promise NOT to try to confuse or basically trick blacks into voting for them for the sake of political gain, because of what the Democrats had been doing. Republicans continued fighting for the true civil rights causes.

Like it or not, the average black person back then was uneducated due to the Democrats and their bigoted legislation. The Democrats took advantage of this, as you can see with all past legislations. This is still going on today. You would think that as the blacks were tricked into voting FOR the party that sought to destroy them, Republicans would stop fighting to help them, BUT they never have. The Democrats continue to be a party full of corruption and manipulation and they have MOST minorities EVEN Christians convinced that Republicans are hate-mongers. NOTHING is further from the truth!

In 1956 and 1960 Republicans were able to fight and pass laws to desegregate public areas, like parks and restaurants in D.C. and planned to further it around the entire nation. They were successful in beginning the desegregation of public schools. The Republicans also fought for fair housing laws making it possible for blacks to purchase equal homes in areas where they were not allowed to live before desegregation. They both had a platform FOR civil rights at that time. However, the Eisenhower (Republican) administration, with Nixon as VP did more for civil rights than ANY other administration. At this time black Americans began to excel and open businesses, get better educations and jobs, homes, etc. They were pulling themselves out of a historically bad situation.

In 1964 America was still reeling from the assassination of JFK. JFK was less willing than Eisenhower to use executive orders to promote civil rights. He made many promises of civil rights that he was unable to see through. He even delayed a promise to sign an executive order to continue to integrate public housing for two years. The prior Republican administration got it started, but was unable to see it through as they were not voted in the next election.  He also delayed a major civil rights bill until 1963, after a violent racially motivated incident. The bill was a result of the Eisenhower administrations 1957 findings, by his appointed Civil Rights Commission. Although Kennedy was a known philanderer, his promises of equality left the nation hoping that his unfulfilled legacy could continue. And death has always had a way of portraying people in a positive light. At this point in history, at least we can be glad that the last two Democratic administrations were willing to do a little for civil rights. Under the Johnson administration there would be two more -big civil rights bills passed. BOTH bills were passed thanks to the Republicans in Congress. There was not much support from the Democrats. By hard work and a century plus of fighting for the enfranchisement of blacks and minorities, Republicans could FINALLY say that their efforts weren’t in vane. The last century of disenfranchisement attempts by the Democrats had failed. Blacks finally had the same rights as whites. The only thing left was to help change the mindsets of the many separatists left in America.

As a result, the Democrats went on to falsely advertise themselves as the champions of civil rights!

They would soon take on causes that were evil and wrong, like abortion, affirmative action and gay marriage, falsely labeling them civil rights causes. They knew that Republicans were strict adherents to the Constitution and would not go for this, so they were able to call them bigots to confuse those who they always fought against. 

Soon we found ourselves in a country that no longer gives the right to life to babies and now the Democrats would fight again to put a covert burden on blacks that was ended by the Republicans. The early proponents for abortion discretely let it be known that abortion MUST be utilized as a method to keep down the population of blacks. They hired black preachers to lie to young black women about whether it is morally right. They were willing to risk the healthy white babies they would exterminate with their covert genocide. So they put an abortion clinic on every corner in the black neighborhoods and fought against laws that made young black men responsible for their children. They allowed and encouraged portrayals of blacks as sex-starved animals to be commonplace in music, television and other public forums.  The Democrats continue to fight for abortion and the Republicans knowing it for the evil it is, continue to fight against it.

The Democrats furthered the abortion legislations as Clinton passed a bill allowing Partial Birth Abortion, which allowed abortion up until the end of the 9th month of pregnancy.  Bush has been fighting against it since he took office.

The tool Democrats have used through Affirmative Action has caused racial unrest and an ideology of inferiority amongst blacks. It has been a powerful psychological tool keeping many whites now feeling slighted as the blacks used to and keeping many blacks feeling like they can’t make it without handouts. It spreads a message of unfairness and inequality in a time when it is now proven that we can be equals intellectually. They have also left fewer blacks wanting to achieve equality in education, due to a fear of inferiority. If you tell a person they can’t do something without help long enough, they will believe you. This causes MOST of the racial unrest that remains in this country.
 
Don't miss the links in red!
 
God Bless you and God Bless America!
 
Please pray for the people of this nation to wake up and see the skunk in the rose garden, before it sprays us all!
 
The Ice Princess
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I’m not a RACIST! I’m just a bigot!

 

I’m not a RACIST! I’m just a bigot!

The origin of the definition from the 15th century: in Old French bigot- an extremely dedicated OR hypocritical person. Isn’t it just like the French to create such a word? The earliest English definition was- a religious hypocrite. It later evolved:

Bigot, by definition (now)-

1)  One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

2)   A person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

3)   A person who constantly and stubbornly holds a particular point of view.

4)    A person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked.
 
5)    A person who is intolerant of opinions which conflict with his own, as in politics or morals.

6)      One obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

How many people white, black, brown, red, yellow or green; Christian, Muslim, Jew or other religion; liberal, Conservative or middle of the road; Republican, Democrat or 3rd Party; above the age of 12, do you know who does NOT fit that definition in some way?

Personally, I fit the definition #3 pretty well. I just can’t look past my own constant and stubborn belief that a baby has a right to be born, despite its race, financial situation or even despite its biological parent’s wish not to have the “burden” of a baby, as Obama would put it.

I actually fit #4 pretty well also. Forgive me for my vehement certainty that Jesus Christ is the son of the ONE God and our one way to salvation.

Forgive me for my bigotry, but I may have a slight distaste for those of another religion specifically (Islam) due to their “innocent” musings regarding my lack of a right to be alive, since I don’t believe as they do.

Forgive me for my bigotry, since I believe as I am taught by the Holy Bible: Murder is unreasonable and wicked.

You shall not murder.

MURDER- the crime of unlawfully and unjustifiably killing another under circumstances defined by statute (as with premeditation); especially: such a crime committed purposely, knowingly, and recklessly with extreme indifference to human life or during the course of a serious felony (as robbery or rape).

I don’t know what kind of bigot it must make me to dare believe that those rights would apply to the life of a human who has committed NO sin and done no wrong?

Deuteronomy 27:25

"Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person."…

Would that ONLY apply to an abortion doctor or would it also apply to a person who votes for somebody who is pro-abortion, so that they may receive welfare in any form? You decide! It’s your cursed soul if you decide wrong.

~Because of this vehement belief I am a REPUBLICAN,

NO MATTER WHAT, unless they are pro-choice!

I would never vote for anybody who believes abortion is okay. Obama and Clinton BOTH vote pro-abortion EVERY single opportunity they get. They even voted against Lacy’s Law. Voting against it is stating that when a crime committed against a pregnant woman results in the death of her baby, that perpetrator is charged with NO extra crime beyond the crime against the Mother.

Proverbs 6-

16  There are six things the LORD hates,
       seven that are detestable to him:

 17  haughty eyes,
       a lying tongue, 
       hands that shed innocent blood,

 18  a heart that devises wicked schemes,
       feet that are quick to rush into evil,

 19  a false witness who pours out lies
       and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

While I have no prejudices against people because of race, I guess I am also a bigot by liberal definition, because I am utterly intolerant of those who believe I owe them something because of wrongs perpetrated against their ancestors by my ancestors (maybe). My ancestors are from the North (Yankees), but I am white- so does that mean I owe somebody who has NEVER been a slave because somebody far back in their lineage was a slave and somebody far back in my lineage COULD have kept slaves?
 
If so, I had a friend growing up who was raped by 5 black men, so all black people owe ME for the undue stress it caused ME, right? NO! How ridiculous would that belief be? Even the girl who was the victim is NOT owed anything by ALL black people.

It is ironic how as a Republican I am automatically seen as prejudiced!

Republicans have done more for civil rights than ANY party in any time.

After all, did Abe Lincoln (a Republican) do NOTHING for the black race?

Is it NOT racist to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. and to IGNORE the accomplishments of Abraham Lincoln?

You tell me, is it because Lincoln did less for blacks than King?

OR is it because Lincoln is white?

Lincoln died because of his civil rights beliefs also and a liberal Democrat sympathizer killed him.

I wish people would REALLY start seeing one another as equals, like they claim to want!

We need to wipe the slate clean. Remove all racially biased programs and organizations from government, such as Affirmative Action. Then stop promoting violence against others of any race, EVEN in MUSIC.

Does that mean I am for censorship and against freedom of speech?

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

 Abridging= shortening, restricting or depriving

Answer this: IF I worked around classified government documents and I SPOKE of that classified information to the Taliban and later caused the death of thousands of innocent people, would that be protected by my freedom of speech?

That freedom is limited when you are putting other people in danger. So what about the police officers who rappers talk about shooting? Do they not deserve protection? That freedom is yet another freedom perverted by liberal lawyers and politicians to give them a loophole to slander and endanger others at will. Until the 20th Century, people were moral enough to have no need to battle in court for that first amendment freedom, but that was before the country strayed from it’s Christian values so far.

 

And what about:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”? Are the liberals in Congress not violating that portion of the First Amendment with the laws taking God out of schools and forcing people to say Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas?

We don’t get it both ways, libs!

I have the utmost respect for any black person who doesn’t hate me or my entire race for the past and who believes in TRUE equality, not the latest liberal venom spewed upon them to convince them the Democrats are the ONLY ones who are not against them.

The Republican Party was created as a split from the Democratic-Republican Party, leaving the liberals (Democrats) and their pro-slavery platform. They split the parties with a primary goal of abolishing slavery. REPUBLICAN= civil rights (NOT perverted unconstitutional ones, like fought for today)/ DEMOCRATS = Pro-slavery.

Look for yourself at a 124 years side by side civil rights platform comparison:

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/misc/CivilRightsPlatforms.pdf

I grew up next door to a very successful black family in OH and the only difference I knew between us was- a tan, until I moved to FL. There I attempted friendships with kids of all races. I was shunned by the majority of black people I tried to befriend and white people were equally obtuse toward me when I attempted inter-racial friendships. As I became old enough to date, I was attracted to boys with blonde hair and blue or green eyes, which never changed. The black males suddenly opened their minds to me. However, I had no interest in dating them, so I was labeled a racist. To this day, I am uncertain why my taste in men made me prejudice??? After all, I was the one who was shunned by the majority of blacks who I tried to befriend, but since I wouldn’t have sex with a black boy, I was the racist?

The black family I was brought up next door to in Ohio was like my family. I loved them very much until the day they died and I still love their kids or grandkids who are still alive. My older sisters were the same age as their two daughters and they were best friends. The Mother was my mentor and protector. She was a wonderful person. They were self-educated intelligent Christian people. They (the Mother and Father) grew up in the midst of the civil rights movement and were never handed anything. They got their business running without handouts, grants, affirmative action or welfare and they managed to become a highly respected fixture in my home town without any of those things. They were very aware and alert of the fact that those programs (handouts) would ruin many blacks. And it unfortunately did! However, I do believe people can change, but first they have to stop listening to liberals who want to make them believe they are owed something by our white government and our white people and start getting back to biblical principals and standards to govern their actions. People like Condoleezza Rice are living up to their potential and not judging others by color. She is somebody to set a standard for black women, not some gansta B- baby mama.

Black Americans were on a very serious cultural incline before these racist programs were established. Now there is an abortion clinic on every corner in black neighborhoods and a great majority of the kids don't know their Dad or don’t have him directly involved in their lives. This happened because they were offered a bigger check for having kids without a marriage, rewarding bad behavior (sin) and NOT obligating the males to stay around, since there was no marriage. I don’t care what your race is, IF you are a Christian you must hold your standards in life up to biblical scrutiny.
 
With all of that said if you are a racist who does not care about the right to life of babies or the Christian freedoms in this nation, you are a Democrat and should feel free to vote that way. If that does NOT describe you and you have been voting Democrat, you are voting incorrectly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holocaust IN AMERICA

 
We are allowing a Holocaust IN AMERICA. Innocent people die every day IN AMERICA, by being burned to death with chemicals, by being chopped into pieces while still alive, by having their heads punctured and their brains suctioned out, and multiple other cruel methods of murder. These people have committed NO crime, not even a sin. These people aren't even given something to stop the pain of their murder. They feel every grueling detail. Sometimes there are reports of their screaming and screeching being so intolerable that the person committing the murder wears ear plugs. These murders are given multiple benign labels, but there have been millions of lives lost in the U.S., due to the government accepting these benign labels.
 
More INNOCENT blacks per capita are murdered in this way than any other race. The person who founded the most popular, accepted and well-known of these murder mills admittedly opened up this "charity" organization to rid the world of blacks. However, she did accept casualties of any other race and color, in order to achieve what she called "a more perfect world". She also targeted any person of inferior breeding; socioeconomic class; and people with handicaps (even minor). She tried to make it possible that people who had parents with even the smallest mental illness (like depression) could be sterilized and never be allowed to have children. She tried to limit the number of kids per household in America to 2 and only allow households who have applied and received a permit to have ANY children. She was basically a communist and as sick as Hitler. However, in America today people still hold parades in her honor.
 
This is a link to a page where you can see evidence of the genocide and murder of innocence. I encourage you to click on the NAZIS link on the left side of this page, for really enlightening information of things happening in America you are likely unaware of. In CA alone there are AT LEAST 127 of these death camps. In the U.S. there are between .8 and 1.5 million murders a year reported to our government and because it has been mislabeled as civil rights, there is nothing they can do to stop it. Those estimates are actually conservative, since CA with their 127+ death camps do not report their statistics. There are other states who don't report also and with a conservative estimate of 10 murders daily in each of the CA locations, there are nearly 500,000 of these unreported murders yearly in CA alone.

These places also allow and even influence the rape of underage children.
 
Nearly all Democrats in Congress and Senate, along with 4 or 5 Republicans (RINOs) like Specter, Snowe, Collins and Paul  (who votes opposite his words) all donate OUR TAX DOLLARS to the mentioned "charity" organization to have more people murdered and/ or for human cloning. Obama and Clinton both VOTE for the death camps, help fund them and are for human cloning. McCain is against those actions. 
 
 
This is NOT the Holocaust currently happening in America, that I spoke of, but it is also on it's way, if not already done in secret: As a result of the aforementioned, they have allowed the harvesting and freezing of cord blood from our children and aborted babies for research purposes. They are now trying to pass legislation that allows them to (no joke) grow a new child from OUR KID's DNA through cloning. Then they are going to give OUR cloned children cancer and other diseases and use them to experiment on. They will have no concerns for the fact that these children are technically OUR children. They intend to do experiments on them that they have not allowed on ANIMALS, due to cruelty in the past. The reason they will allow this is because they "technically" do not exist. Democrats are pushing this forward as new research.
 
How would you feel if you walked into a research lab and saw an exact replica of your son or daughter, being experimented on with techniques terrorist wouldn't condone? 
 
What if- they even recognized you and called you Mom or Dad?
 
We don't know how much these kids will be aware of. Supposedly cloned animals, cloned from other baby animals have the same characteristics and immediately recognize their parents. This is a link to an UNBIASED source which tells of the mentioned issues.
 
Obama has even voted in such a way that he'd allow aborted infants who are BORN ALIVE to be left on a shelf to starve and die or be murdered by the doctor or nurse. Here is a link to information on what Planned Parenthood is all about. They are a Democrat-loving, baby killing, black targeting racist group. As you can see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwif0VMW3c4
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LOST

To those of you who don't know what LOST is, it is a threat to national security. It gives the UN control of our Navy and the intelligence gathered by them. It puts our military men and women in harm's way. It has many in Senate voting for it. I wrote the following letter to Senate. I included a Christian perspective on MANY other issues, because I am tired of being ignored in this country because of my Christian majority status. PLEASE, even if you don't agree with my entire letter, you can feel free to use all of it, parts of it or write your own. This is a very dangerous piece of legislation that knows NO boundaries of race, party affiliation, sexual preference, etc.. It will hurt ALL Americans! 
 
CLICK HERE for a petition.
PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE (At LEAST The aforementioned information).
 
My letter to Congress and Senate:

L.O.S.T. needs to be LOST!

 

I am representing a part of America that has far too long been ignored by the left. I am a part of the MAJORITY (at least for now)- a white non-Hispanic CHRISTIAN. I can tell you now that government is making a great big mistake by ignoring and alienating us for so long. Most Christians aren't so drunk, hung over or high on drugs that we don't bother to vote, so watch out how you treat us or you won't get anywhere.

 

EVERY single Christian I have spoken to, despite race are tired of the weak policies of Democrats. We are against abortion and appalled by the left's ridiculously weak stance on protecting babies with Constitutional rights. We are sick of their programs like SEICUS and taking parental rights to notification away. We are tired of you replacing the teaching of abstinence and disease prevention with abortion clinics. We are tired of you trying to control the population of black Americans by making these "Planned Parenthood" and other abortion clinics so accessible in black neighborhoods.
 
We want those babies to have a chance to contribute to society and the baby's race is NOT an issue. We are tired of you taking our tax dollars to pay for abortions. We AGREE with the war in Iraq and we believe in our military. We are tired of you wiping your feet on the Constitution and preaching your false doctrine about separation of Church and state. It doesn't exist. We are tired of your ridiculous claims of the Republicans being racist. Did you ever hear of Abe Lincoln? There has not been ONE Republican since Lincoln that didn't protect TRUE civil rights. We are tired of you playing the race card about illegal immigration. There is NO up side to the U.S. citizens (of all races) you have SWORN to protect. We are tired of the protection of things like Gay marriage. It is a cause even most homosexuals wouldn't concern themselves with if you weren't telling them that we will take all rights away from them.

Homosexuality is a mental disorder and the APA just removed it from the list of mental disorders in 1979, due to liberal pressure. Those in the counsel admittedly still saw it as a mental disorder. Look into
Dr. Irving Bieber's research. However, intelligent Christians do not see a homosexual as a person with any less rights than a person suffering from Bi-polar Disorder. We see all sin as equal and are a religion of love that invites and embraces all sinners. AND we are ALL sinners. We want everybody to be given a chance to understand our God's teachings. We (Christians) are NOT a hateful religion like you portray us as. We are also tired of buying oil from people (OPEC, for example) who use slaves, kill people and abuse human rights to overprice and sell us their oil.

We could be drilling the ANWR and other local places, lower the prices back to about $1/gal and rescue the American people from the stronghold of the Middle-East. They (Islamic extremists) want to annihilate us for God's sake. There is a reason nearly all Christians with a brain vote Republican. Democrats stand for all of the things I have listed that are immoral and more! If you want our votes, take a little time to think of MAJORITY rights too.

 

ALSO: I want the United Nations OUT of our business. Have any of you (the majority CLAIMING to be Christians) ever read Revelations? So when do you want us to give this New World Government the right to put their number on us for the right to buy & sell? For God's sake, HOW can you allow the UN more power over us and ANY control of our military? Although this doesn't sound very mature to say: Are you stupid? (Those of you who are for LOST) How could you want to put our military and our submarines in harms way? There is a reason submarines were made as underwater vessels: COVERT operations to protect our nation's security.
 
I do not support the Law of the Sea Treaty (L.O.S.T.) and I will be watching your vote on this issue. If you want mine or that of any intelligent Christian, think twice before supporting such nonsense!
 
God Bless!
The Ice Princess (Tina)
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »