About Me

Name: The Ice Princess
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The government should stay out of a woman’s business???

Posted by The Ice Princess on Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:54:40 PM

To those of you who say the government should stay out of a woman’s business:

 

Who are you kidding that the government should have NO control over the killing of HUMANS? 

If somebody came to your home and killed your family, there should be NO government intervention???

How stupid is that?

If you believe that way:
Are you so morally bankrupt that you really believe people should have a choice to kill people who have committed no sin and no crime?

Men who get vasectomies have counseling beforehand. As do women who have breast jobs. If more men, who wanted NO children, would take the initiative to have a vasectomy, the abortion problem would shrink. If you aren't against it- YOU ARE FOR IT. Therefore, IF you vote FOR people who vote pro-choice YOU are choosing to be pro-choice. Hence you are responsible for these murders. Like it or not, people ARE accountable for their actions.

So are you FOR killing babies?


Are you for infanticide?


It is on the way to America and already exists thanks to Obama and MOST Democrats in many places in the US.

He tried to be sure it was legal in IL.

Now as for women and choice-


I am pro-choice up to a certain place. (Keep reading)

Where choice should end:


In a nation with a Freedom of Religion-

A woman should be able to choose who she has sex with and if she has sex.

She should be able to choose if she uses birth control methods or if she chooses to risk it.

She should be able to choose if she has sex around the time of her ovulation, which all women should be educated enough to know.

She should be able to choose if she has multiple sex partners and risks disease or if she wants to be monogamous.

She should be able to choose her friends and her boyfriends and if she will allow her friends to become boyfriends.

She should be able to choose if she wants to have sex with multiple partners at one time.

 

She should be able to choose if she wants to be right or wrong in God’s eyes and even if she wants to believe in God. Those are issues of free-will, like them or not. God gave us that free-will and we must be able to exercise it, but he DID tell us NOT to commit MURDER.

IF she made any of the wrong choices, she has already chosen the possibility of a pregnancy.

Meaning the initial choice of pregnancy was HERS.

I am against abortion in ANY way, including this: but if she didn't want to have that child or risk being pregnant, she could have acted within a day or two of that pregnancy and taken an herbal abortant or 5 or 6 birth control pills (that's what the morning after pill is). The internet clearly gives information on abortion inducers. Right or wrong, what is the excuse for going any further?

 

I DO NOT ADVOCATE, PROMOTE OR AGREE WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED. I just want to state that it is better for all involved IF a woman is going to murder the baby that she not allow that child to become aware first.

Accepting abortion is mislabeled as pro-choice. It is pro-murder.

Since this country has a freedom of religion: For those poor women who are raped and impregnated, abortion should be a choice (even though I would NOT choose it). The choice of sex was NOT theirs. So, therefore the abortion should be legal up to about a month after she is able to remove herself from the situation. That would give her a little time to decide and be aware of what she is doing, while removing the emotional stressors of the rape. It should not be promoted or advocated. She should be encouraged to seek counsel with her spiritual leader and family or friends. She needs to be warned about the increased risk of breast, uterine, cervical and other cancer when she decides to terminate that life. That way she doesn't have to be punished twice for the rape, with a serious disease that she did not choose to risk. She should be encouraged to give the baby up for adoption, so that the child is not seen as a burden, unless she is of superior mental health and spiritual values and could love the child. She should be counseled on the decision, but if she is too far along before seeking help, Partial Birth Abortion is not a viable option.

That last paragraph is just my opinion, even though I am certain I would choose life.

It is NOT okay to murder innocent life. A choice is made to risk it before sex. Even those without religious convictions know that murder is wrong. Deluding yourself to believe it is okay is damaging the boundaries of society. Everybody deserves a chance to live.

 

With all of that said, she does have a right to do whatever she wants with her body, but once another life is implanted in her womb, she is a temporary life support system for that human. Therefore, her decisions end. The ONLY one with a right to decide what to do with that new person’s body is God. There is a new life in there and once that miracle has taken place, she does NOT have to choose to raise that child or be a part of its life in any way. But she has no right to end another human life, even if it means her abs are ruined forever.


God Bless!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NON-profit funding of the Democrats- Is it moral?

Posted by The Ice Princess on Monday, May 12, 2008 5:28:49 PM
Why do the Democrats get all of the funding?
 
One answer to that question would surprise many. Would it shock you to know that a NON-PROFIT organization had enough of a PROFIT to contribute 10,000,000 (ten million dollars) to Democrats in this election?
 
That same "NON-PROFIT" organization gets around 300,000,000 from Federal and state government contributions (YOUR tax dollars). They also reportedly brought in over 1 BILLION dollars in the last fiscal year.
 
HOW?
 
Business is GREAT!
 
What is the business, you ask?
ABORTION
 
Planned Parenthood, America's largest PRO-ABORTION group.
 
Does it make you wonder why they want a Democrat in office SO BADLY?
It shouldn't. They are nearly all pro-ABORTION and the two running for President have been KNOWN to support Planned Parenthood with both tax AND personal dollars.
 
How does Planned Parenthood have SUCH an excess in money that they could contribute such a large amount to the Democrats?
As I said above, business is great. There has been an increase in the number of abortions provided by them from 264,943 in 2005 to 289,650 in 2006. That is more than 25,000 MORE abortions than usual over that year. I wonder what will happen when the reports come out for 2007?
 
Do you wonder why there is an increase?
Democrats DO NOT support ANY Abstinence programs, which are known to decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies drastically. However, they support abortion?? How does that work out? It works out great for them. Essentially, killing babies is a big business, which is linked with racism and also linked with supporting the Democrats in achieving office. The more abortions, the more Democrats and vice-versa.
 
How is it linked with racism?
Read this for yourself: http://www.lifenews.com/nat3757.html 
Affirmative Action is also a very racist motivated Democratically supported thing.
 
THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE AND DON'T SUPPORT A PRO-ABORTION CANDIDATE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR ABORTIONS!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »