About Me

Name: The Ice Princess
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Throwing God under the bus

Posted by The Ice Princess on Friday, July 18, 2008 3:48:22 PM
 

Throwing God under the bus-

Why not? Who needs God anyway? Right?

I, for one, need God and find it unfortunate that this nation finds His laws and words so trivial and old-school.

I used to belong to the party that promoted God’s will, because it was their will too. Now it seems I belong to a party that places their own selfish agenda about 10 steps above God’s will. I still vote loyally for the GOP, because of the few ways they continue to stick up for God and because the alternative is a virtual fast forward into the rapture with Democrats in leadership. The Democrats tend to put God’s will, let me see- 1, 2, 3 uh yeah 3 million steps below their own agenda. They seem to have forgotten that the see no .., hear no .., speak no .. monkeys, were actually talking about evil and not God. They seem to think it is better that God is not seen and not heard in any facet of society.

I am sad to say that the people, even the BIG named GOP writers in my party have put God on the back burner. Money and protecting our money must come first! Romney seems to be a good fiscal Conservative. Forget the fact that Romney has thrown God under the bus, although professing Christianity at the same time. Let me tell you something- we are exactly what our actions dictate that we are, not what our words say we are. I mean, I could say all day “I am Angelina Joule. I am Angelina Joule….” and I can look in the mirror and guess who I’m not? I think that’s how you spell her name. Can you tell I am not really all that enamored with Hollyweird?

My point is, Romney can claim to be a Christian all day, all week, all month, and all year and when he looks in the mirror, guess what he’s not? His words would make him a fine Christian. However, his actions dictate otherwise. I am not coming out against him, because his religion still doesn’t follow the laws of our country, nor am I coming out against him because of the cult status of his religion. I am not coming out against him because the people of his religion believe in false prophets that speak out overtly against the word of the Bible (with their man-made after the Bible texts), despite claiming the Bible to be their guidebook. I am not coming out against him because his religion thinks our God belonged to a counsel of Gods that had a meeting before designing the Earth. If he wants to believe all of that, he was given the same free will I was given, so more power to him.

I am coming out against him, because he says one thing and does the other. He has ALWAYS stood behind abortion with his voting power, now saying he’s against it. And although he helped pass through the legalization of the morning after pill, he voted against giving it to rape victims freely. I take that to mean, it is okay to abort your baby, unless it was created in rape?? He was also against stem cell research, but has continued to vote in a way that keeps abortion legal. That just shocks me. I take that to mean- its okay to kill the babies, but not to use their stem cells to help fight disease?? I am not saying I am for embryonic stem cell research, but if I thought abortion was okay, why wouldn’t I be? You take it how you want. We are all individually accountable to God.

Another thing that really gets me is how he has supported gay civil unions, fought to allow gay Boy Scout troop leaders, voted to allow gays OPENLY in the military and shortly before running in the GOP presidential primaries; he came out to fight against gay marriage.

Which is it Romney, I’d like to know? Is it God or agenda?

He was the 3rd most liberal candidate running in the primaries (McCain was the 4th-right in the middle) and ironically we had a bunch of Conservative authors backing Romney and throwing McCain under the bus. Let’s not forget that McCain is a war hero, with an honorable record, despite several bad votes. Every good president in recent history made bad decisions before getting into office, including Reagan. However, MOST of McCain’s bad decisions were on the fiscal end of things. MOST of Romney’s bad decisions were on the social end of the scale. If you do not know what that means, the bad social decisions for a Republican are equivalent to a decision that is against the will of God.

Now I find a sudden influx of Mormons and so-called Conservatives, many claiming to be Christians who are pushing for McCain to pick Romney as VP everywhere. There are only a few people he could pick who to run Senate (which is the VP’s job) who would be worse than Romney for the Christian cause, but there are dozens of people who would be better.

As a Christian, I like to live every day as if it were my last. Not meaning that I’ll party like its 1999. I mean that I like to live every day as if it could be the day I stand in front of God and explain my decisions.

If you knew you would die tomorrow and have to face God, would you promote a man who votes against the will of God 30% of the time today?

Think about it!

The only thing worse in my opinion would be doing ANYTHING that could help a Democrat get into office.

That is tantamount to throwing God under the bus.

The separation of church and state that Democrat’s CLAIM is in our Constitution does NOT exist. Our founding fathers wrote multiple texts telling us we should never take our faith out of our decisions and they also made it so that our government had to be sworn in on the Bible, proving their allegiance to this country as an oath before God. If somebody has no faith in the word of the Bible or our God, how can they be trusted to run our country?

So, I will pray hard that McCain picks a good CHRISTIAN Conservative VP and NOT Romney. However, if he picks Romney, I will just pray harder, remove anything that goes against Romney from my blog, pray some more, swallow my pride and vote for McCain/ Romney. Then I will pray some more that if Romney doesn’t truly change that he never makes it to president.

McCain has promised Conservative judges. Obama has promised liberal ones. I have a blog about what could come as a result, so a vote for a 3rd party will only hurt our country too.

I quote these often, but that is because they pertain to what is happening in the country.

Proverbs 6-

16 There are six things the LORD hates,
seven that are detestable to him:

17 haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
HANDS THAT SHED INNOCENT BLOOD,

18 a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,

19 a FALSE WITNESS WHO POURS OUT LIES,
and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

Deuteronomy 27:25

"Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person."…

Would you want to face God after making decisions detestable to God?

Don’t throw God under the bus!

May God Bless you and keep you always!

Tina

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY-Wake up!

Posted by The Ice Princess on Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:26:24 PM

   Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY 

You really need to read this about who is who in politics. It can open your eyes to who the TRUE civil rights champions are:
                                       

John Quincy Adams was called the hell-hound of abolition. He wanted slavery abolished. Meanwhile those who would later become Democrats fought hard to keep it legal. MOST of our founding fathers, even those who held slaves were abolitionists eventually. As early as 1789, they were fighting to have it abolished.

In 1854 the Democratic controlled Congress fought and passed a law expanding slavery called the Kansas-Nebraska act. This led to contention in our government and caused a split of the Democratic-Republican Party. One side- the Democrats fought hard to pass legislation to keep and expand slavery. Our Republicans fought harder to abolish it.

These things led Lincoln to take us to war, for the sake of abolishing the evil practice of slavery completely. The Democrats went on to fight AGAINST every civil rights legislation which we (the Republicans) fought hard to pass.

The 1864 Republican Platform gives us both reason and right as a party to drill for oil, since OPEC forces people into slavery. We should have NO MORE TO DO WITH THEM. It speaks of how the Republican government finds it detestable and shall not partake in anything advocating it. The Democrats platform just complains about the Republicans using the military to uphold fair elections, to keep pro-slavery (Democrats) people from acting out violently against those who oppose it (Republicans).

In 1868 the Democrats Platform actually accuses Republicans of fighting for "Negro supremacy" and they promised to fight against any further civil rights for blacks. The Republicans just declared sympathy for the opressed.

In 1872 the platforms- the Dems demanded amnesty to protect them from prosecution for the crimes against humanity perpetrated in the civil war. The Republicans platform was to emancipate 4 million slaves, give them citizenship and voting rights. In 1872- 87% of the Democrats voted against an equal education Bill for black Americans.

In 1876 the Democrats' platform was calling the Republicans unfair for fighting for the rights of blacks and they claim that it is NOT a majority in America that wanted their freedom. The Republicans' platform promised to purge the US of slavery and to fight for civil rights for blacks.

In 1880 the Republicans were sending military people to the places people voted to assure the safety of blacks who were trying to vote. The Democrats called it corruption?? Again the Republican platform spoke out against slavery.

In 1884 the Democrats of the South found a new way to be unfair to the blacks by creating the "Black Code" and only allowing them to partake in servile labor, making them less than a white man. The Republicans fought against this and tried to abolish the Black Code.

1888 and 1892 - The Republicans stay on track and promise to fight FOR equal rights. In 1892 the Democrats made basic proclamations of change, which were later evidenced as untrue.

In 1896 the Republican Party platform took a stand against lynching, which was still going on, despite the Republicans efforts to stop unequal treatment. The Democrats came out with a not so new civil rights cause- freedom of religion (already covered in the Constitution). It was later taken further to mean freedom FROM religion and morphed into a lie about the meaning of the Constitution (the false claims of Separation of Church and State).

In 1900 The Republican Party platform pertained to the 15th Amendment- against discrimination. The Democrats said nothing about civil rights that year, same as 1888. However, the years they said something- it was against civil rights.

In 1904, The Democrats' platform claimed that all racial inequality was healed at that point. WHAT?? The Republicans disagreed and demanded fair representation, so they could continue to fight for those rights.

From 1908-1936 The Democrats' platform made NO mention of race or civil rights. The Republicans came out again to fight for equal rights for blacks in 1908, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1932 and 1936. They also continued to try to pass legislation to stop the lynching in 1920, 1924 and 1928. Democrats at that time were against stiff criminal penalties for lynching and there was equal protection for a dog. In 1936 the Republicans were trying to pass laws for fair employment and safety rights for black Americans.

In 1940, Roosevelt, a Democrat pandered to black Americans and appointed blacks to his cabinet to advise him on race issues. Although, he did little for civil rights and didn't even introduce ONE civil rights Bill during his presidency. This was the start of the BIG LIE, where the Democrats showed themselves to be pro-civil-rights and actually did nothing for minorities. In 1940, The Republican platform was to promise a square deal and to enact civil service reform, making the military unbiased towards blacks.

The 1944 platforms were: The Democrats made a vague promise of civil rights for people of racial and religious minority. This would later have Democrats inferring to blacks that they are the same as people of quirky and sick religions, even Satanism. It was made to sound like they would lose their rights if they didn’t take a stand for these quirky civil rights causes being pandered by the liberals and it continues today with abortion and gay marriage. The Republicans were still fighting to get the Democrats to agree with them on legislation to penalize racists for lynching. Ironically, the Democrats at this time were coming out as THE party for civil rights, yet enacting no good legislation to protect blacks. The Republicans were still fighting AGAINST discrimination, segregation and unfair treatment of blacks, despite the liberals manipulating them into becoming Democrats every chance they got. Government had been making people pay a poll tax, so they could vote. With the state of the economy for blacks, thanks to the Democrats killing the legislation Republicans tried to pass, most blacks could not afford to vote. Republicans wanted to make voting EQUAL for ALL classes and possible for all blacks, so they tried to abolish the poll tax.

In 1948 the Democrats under Truman finally listened to the REPUBLICANS and enacted an anti-lynching law. The Republicans had tried and failed for decades, because of the Democrats in office. Truman also finally abolished the poll tax (for Federal elections) that Republicans were trying to abolish. Despite almost all of this new legislation being legislation the Republicans had been trying to pass for decades and being stonewalled by the Democrats, the Democrats still got credit for it. Again the Republicans platform was to protect civil rights and abolish segregation. Therefore, despite many Democrats voting against the new civil rights laws, these things were finally passed because of the Republicans voting for them.

In 1952 The Democrats platform was a very basic statement about upholding rights. The Republicans made a promise NOT to try to confuse or basically trick blacks into voting for them for the sake of political gain, because of what the Democrats had been doing. Republicans continued fighting for the true civil rights causes.

Like it or not, the average black person back then was uneducated due to the Democrats and their bigoted legislation. The Democrats took advantage of this, as you can see with all past legislations. This is still going on today. You would think that as the blacks were tricked into voting FOR the party that sought to destroy them, Republicans would stop fighting to help them, BUT they never have. The Democrats continue to be a party full of corruption and manipulation and they have MOST minorities EVEN Christians convinced that Republicans are hate-mongers. NOTHING is further from the truth!

In 1956 and 1960 Republicans were able to fight and pass laws to desegregate public areas, like parks and restaurants in D.C. and planned to further it around the entire nation. They were successful in beginning the desegregation of public schools. The Republicans also fought for fair housing laws making it possible for blacks to purchase equal homes in areas where they were not allowed to live before desegregation. They both had a platform FOR civil rights at that time. However, the Eisenhower (Republican) administration, with Nixon as VP did more for civil rights than ANY other administration. At this time black Americans began to excel and open businesses, get better educations and jobs, homes, etc. They were pulling themselves out of a historically bad situation.

In 1964 America was still reeling from the assassination of JFK. JFK was less willing than Eisenhower to use executive orders to promote civil rights. He made many promises of civil rights that he was unable to see through. He even delayed a promise to sign an executive order to continue to integrate public housing for two years. The prior Republican administration got it started, but was unable to see it through as they were not voted in the next election.  He also delayed a major civil rights bill until 1963, after a violent racially motivated incident. The bill was a result of the Eisenhower administrations 1957 findings, by his appointed Civil Rights Commission. Although Kennedy was a known philanderer, his promises of equality left the nation hoping that his unfulfilled legacy could continue. And death has always had a way of portraying people in a positive light. At this point in history, at least we can be glad that the last two Democratic administrations were willing to do a little for civil rights. Under the Johnson administration there would be two more -big civil rights bills passed. BOTH bills were passed thanks to the Republicans in Congress. There was not much support from the Democrats. By hard work and a century plus of fighting for the enfranchisement of blacks and minorities, Republicans could FINALLY say that their efforts weren’t in vane. The last century of disenfranchisement attempts by the Democrats had failed. Blacks finally had the same rights as whites. The only thing left was to help change the mindsets of the many separatists left in America.

As a result, the Democrats went on to falsely advertise themselves as the champions of civil rights!

They would soon take on causes that were evil and wrong, like abortion, affirmative action and gay marriage, falsely labeling them civil rights causes. They knew that Republicans were strict adherents to the Constitution and would not go for this, so they were able to call them bigots to confuse those who they always fought against. 

Soon we found ourselves in a country that no longer gives the right to life to babies and now the Democrats would fight again to put a covert burden on blacks that was ended by the Republicans. The early proponents for abortion discretely let it be known that abortion MUST be utilized as a method to keep down the population of blacks. They hired black preachers to lie to young black women about whether it is morally right. They were willing to risk the healthy white babies they would exterminate with their covert genocide. So they put an abortion clinic on every corner in the black neighborhoods and fought against laws that made young black men responsible for their children. They allowed and encouraged portrayals of blacks as sex-starved animals to be commonplace in music, television and other public forums.  The Democrats continue to fight for abortion and the Republicans knowing it for the evil it is, continue to fight against it.

The Democrats furthered the abortion legislations as Clinton passed a bill allowing Partial Birth Abortion, which allowed abortion up until the end of the 9th month of pregnancy.  Bush has been fighting against it since he took office.

The tool Democrats have used through Affirmative Action has caused racial unrest and an ideology of inferiority amongst blacks. It has been a powerful psychological tool keeping many whites now feeling slighted as the blacks used to and keeping many blacks feeling like they can’t make it without handouts. It spreads a message of unfairness and inequality in a time when it is now proven that we can be equals intellectually. They have also left fewer blacks wanting to achieve equality in education, due to a fear of inferiority. If you tell a person they can’t do something without help long enough, they will believe you. This causes MOST of the racial unrest that remains in this country.
 
Don't miss the links in red!
 
God Bless you and God Bless America!
 
Please pray for the people of this nation to wake up and see the skunk in the rose garden, before it sprays us all!
 
The Ice Princess
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The government should stay out of a woman’s business???

Posted by The Ice Princess on Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:54:40 PM

To those of you who say the government should stay out of a woman’s business:

 

Who are you kidding that the government should have NO control over the killing of HUMANS? 

If somebody came to your home and killed your family, there should be NO government intervention???

How stupid is that?

If you believe that way:
Are you so morally bankrupt that you really believe people should have a choice to kill people who have committed no sin and no crime?

Men who get vasectomies have counseling beforehand. As do women who have breast jobs. If more men, who wanted NO children, would take the initiative to have a vasectomy, the abortion problem would shrink. If you aren't against it- YOU ARE FOR IT. Therefore, IF you vote FOR people who vote pro-choice YOU are choosing to be pro-choice. Hence you are responsible for these murders. Like it or not, people ARE accountable for their actions.

So are you FOR killing babies?


Are you for infanticide?


It is on the way to America and already exists thanks to Obama and MOST Democrats in many places in the US.

He tried to be sure it was legal in IL.

Now as for women and choice-


I am pro-choice up to a certain place. (Keep reading)

Where choice should end:


In a nation with a Freedom of Religion-

A woman should be able to choose who she has sex with and if she has sex.

She should be able to choose if she uses birth control methods or if she chooses to risk it.

She should be able to choose if she has sex around the time of her ovulation, which all women should be educated enough to know.

She should be able to choose if she has multiple sex partners and risks disease or if she wants to be monogamous.

She should be able to choose her friends and her boyfriends and if she will allow her friends to become boyfriends.

She should be able to choose if she wants to have sex with multiple partners at one time.

 

She should be able to choose if she wants to be right or wrong in God’s eyes and even if she wants to believe in God. Those are issues of free-will, like them or not. God gave us that free-will and we must be able to exercise it, but he DID tell us NOT to commit MURDER.

IF she made any of the wrong choices, she has already chosen the possibility of a pregnancy.

Meaning the initial choice of pregnancy was HERS.

I am against abortion in ANY way, including this: but if she didn't want to have that child or risk being pregnant, she could have acted within a day or two of that pregnancy and taken an herbal abortant or 5 or 6 birth control pills (that's what the morning after pill is). The internet clearly gives information on abortion inducers. Right or wrong, what is the excuse for going any further?

 

I DO NOT ADVOCATE, PROMOTE OR AGREE WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED. I just want to state that it is better for all involved IF a woman is going to murder the baby that she not allow that child to become aware first.

Accepting abortion is mislabeled as pro-choice. It is pro-murder.

Since this country has a freedom of religion: For those poor women who are raped and impregnated, abortion should be a choice (even though I would NOT choose it). The choice of sex was NOT theirs. So, therefore the abortion should be legal up to about a month after she is able to remove herself from the situation. That would give her a little time to decide and be aware of what she is doing, while removing the emotional stressors of the rape. It should not be promoted or advocated. She should be encouraged to seek counsel with her spiritual leader and family or friends. She needs to be warned about the increased risk of breast, uterine, cervical and other cancer when she decides to terminate that life. That way she doesn't have to be punished twice for the rape, with a serious disease that she did not choose to risk. She should be encouraged to give the baby up for adoption, so that the child is not seen as a burden, unless she is of superior mental health and spiritual values and could love the child. She should be counseled on the decision, but if she is too far along before seeking help, Partial Birth Abortion is not a viable option.

That last paragraph is just my opinion, even though I am certain I would choose life.

It is NOT okay to murder innocent life. A choice is made to risk it before sex. Even those without religious convictions know that murder is wrong. Deluding yourself to believe it is okay is damaging the boundaries of society. Everybody deserves a chance to live.

 

With all of that said, she does have a right to do whatever she wants with her body, but once another life is implanted in her womb, she is a temporary life support system for that human. Therefore, her decisions end. The ONLY one with a right to decide what to do with that new person’s body is God. There is a new life in there and once that miracle has taken place, she does NOT have to choose to raise that child or be a part of its life in any way. But she has no right to end another human life, even if it means her abs are ruined forever.


God Bless!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I’m not a RACIST! I’m just a bigot!

Posted by The Ice Princess on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:42:26 PM
 

I’m not a RACIST! I’m just a bigot!

The origin of the definition from the 15th century: in Old French bigot- an extremely dedicated OR hypocritical person. Isn’t it just like the French to create such a word? The earliest English definition was- a religious hypocrite. It later evolved:

Bigot, by definition (now)-

1)  One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

2)   A person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

3)   A person who constantly and stubbornly holds a particular point of view.

4)    A person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked.
 
5)    A person who is intolerant of opinions which conflict with his own, as in politics or morals.

6)      One obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

How many people white, black, brown, red, yellow or green; Christian, Muslim, Jew or other religion; liberal, Conservative or middle of the road; Republican, Democrat or 3rd Party; above the age of 12, do you know who does NOT fit that definition in some way?

Personally, I fit the definition #3 pretty well. I just can’t look past my own constant and stubborn belief that a baby has a right to be born, despite its race, financial situation or even despite its biological parent’s wish not to have the “burden” of a baby, as Obama would put it.

I actually fit #4 pretty well also. Forgive me for my vehement certainty that Jesus Christ is the son of the ONE God and our one way to salvation.

Forgive me for my bigotry, but I may have a slight distaste for those of another religion specifically (Islam) due to their “innocent” musings regarding my lack of a right to be alive, since I don’t believe as they do.

Forgive me for my bigotry, since I believe as I am taught by the Holy Bible: Murder is unreasonable and wicked.

You shall not murder.

MURDER- the crime of unlawfully and unjustifiably killing another under circumstances defined by statute (as with premeditation); especially: such a crime committed purposely, knowingly, and recklessly with extreme indifference to human life or during the course of a serious felony (as robbery or rape).

I don’t know what kind of bigot it must make me to dare believe that those rights would apply to the life of a human who has committed NO sin and done no wrong?

Deuteronomy 27:25

"Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person."…

Would that ONLY apply to an abortion doctor or would it also apply to a person who votes for somebody who is pro-abortion, so that they may receive welfare in any form? You decide! It’s your cursed soul if you decide wrong.

~Because of this vehement belief I am a REPUBLICAN,

NO MATTER WHAT, unless they are pro-choice!

I would never vote for anybody who believes abortion is okay. Obama and Clinton BOTH vote pro-abortion EVERY single opportunity they get. They even voted against Lacy’s Law. Voting against it is stating that when a crime committed against a pregnant woman results in the death of her baby, that perpetrator is charged with NO extra crime beyond the crime against the Mother.

Proverbs 6-

16  There are six things the LORD hates,
       seven that are detestable to him:

 17  haughty eyes,
       a lying tongue, 
       hands that shed innocent blood,

 18  a heart that devises wicked schemes,
       feet that are quick to rush into evil,

 19  a false witness who pours out lies
       and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

While I have no prejudices against people because of race, I guess I am also a bigot by liberal definition, because I am utterly intolerant of those who believe I owe them something because of wrongs perpetrated against their ancestors by my ancestors (maybe). My ancestors are from the North (Yankees), but I am white- so does that mean I owe somebody who has NEVER been a slave because somebody far back in their lineage was a slave and somebody far back in my lineage COULD have kept slaves?
 
If so, I had a friend growing up who was raped by 5 black men, so all black people owe ME for the undue stress it caused ME, right? NO! How ridiculous would that belief be? Even the girl who was the victim is NOT owed anything by ALL black people.

It is ironic how as a Republican I am automatically seen as prejudiced!

Republicans have done more for civil rights than ANY party in any time.

After all, did Abe Lincoln (a Republican) do NOTHING for the black race?

Is it NOT racist to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. and to IGNORE the accomplishments of Abraham Lincoln?

You tell me, is it because Lincoln did less for blacks than King?

OR is it because Lincoln is white?

Lincoln died because of his civil rights beliefs also and a liberal Democrat sympathizer killed him.

I wish people would REALLY start seeing one another as equals, like they claim to want!

We need to wipe the slate clean. Remove all racially biased programs and organizations from government, such as Affirmative Action. Then stop promoting violence against others of any race, EVEN in MUSIC.

Does that mean I am for censorship and against freedom of speech?

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

 Abridging= shortening, restricting or depriving

Answer this: IF I worked around classified government documents and I SPOKE of that classified information to the Taliban and later caused the death of thousands of innocent people, would that be protected by my freedom of speech?

That freedom is limited when you are putting other people in danger. So what about the police officers who rappers talk about shooting? Do they not deserve protection? That freedom is yet another freedom perverted by liberal lawyers and politicians to give them a loophole to slander and endanger others at will. Until the 20th Century, people were moral enough to have no need to battle in court for that first amendment freedom, but that was before the country strayed from it’s Christian values so far.

 

And what about:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”? Are the liberals in Congress not violating that portion of the First Amendment with the laws taking God out of schools and forcing people to say Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas?

We don’t get it both ways, libs!

I have the utmost respect for any black person who doesn’t hate me or my entire race for the past and who believes in TRUE equality, not the latest liberal venom spewed upon them to convince them the Democrats are the ONLY ones who are not against them.

The Republican Party was created as a split from the Democratic-Republican Party, leaving the liberals (Democrats) and their pro-slavery platform. They split the parties with a primary goal of abolishing slavery. REPUBLICAN= civil rights (NOT perverted unconstitutional ones, like fought for today)/ DEMOCRATS = Pro-slavery.

Look for yourself at a 124 years side by side civil rights platform comparison:

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/misc/CivilRightsPlatforms.pdf

I grew up next door to a very successful black family in OH and the only difference I knew between us was- a tan, until I moved to FL. There I attempted friendships with kids of all races. I was shunned by the majority of black people I tried to befriend and white people were equally obtuse toward me when I attempted inter-racial friendships. As I became old enough to date, I was attracted to boys with blonde hair and blue or green eyes, which never changed. The black males suddenly opened their minds to me. However, I had no interest in dating them, so I was labeled a racist. To this day, I am uncertain why my taste in men made me prejudice??? After all, I was the one who was shunned by the majority of blacks who I tried to befriend, but since I wouldn’t have sex with a black boy, I was the racist?

The black family I was brought up next door to in Ohio was like my family. I loved them very much until the day they died and I still love their kids or grandkids who are still alive. My older sisters were the same age as their two daughters and they were best friends. The Mother was my mentor and protector. She was a wonderful person. They were self-educated intelligent Christian people. They (the Mother and Father) grew up in the midst of the civil rights movement and were never handed anything. They got their business running without handouts, grants, affirmative action or welfare and they managed to become a highly respected fixture in my home town without any of those things. They were very aware and alert of the fact that those programs (handouts) would ruin many blacks. And it unfortunately did! However, I do believe people can change, but first they have to stop listening to liberals who want to make them believe they are owed something by our white government and our white people and start getting back to biblical principals and standards to govern their actions. People like Condoleezza Rice are living up to their potential and not judging others by color. She is somebody to set a standard for black women, not some gansta B- baby mama.

Black Americans were on a very serious cultural incline before these racist programs were established. Now there is an abortion clinic on every corner in black neighborhoods and a great majority of the kids don't know their Dad or don’t have him directly involved in their lives. This happened because they were offered a bigger check for having kids without a marriage, rewarding bad behavior (sin) and NOT obligating the males to stay around, since there was no marriage. I don’t care what your race is, IF you are a Christian you must hold your standards in life up to biblical scrutiny.
 
With all of that said if you are a racist who does not care about the right to life of babies or the Christian freedoms in this nation, you are a Democrat and should feel free to vote that way. If that does NOT describe you and you have been voting Democrat, you are voting incorrectly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »