About Me

Name: The Ice Princess
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY-Wake up!

Posted by The Ice Princess on Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:26:24 PM

   Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY 

You really need to read this about who is who in politics. It can open your eyes to who the TRUE civil rights champions are:
                                       

John Quincy Adams was called the hell-hound of abolition. He wanted slavery abolished. Meanwhile those who would later become Democrats fought hard to keep it legal. MOST of our founding fathers, even those who held slaves were abolitionists eventually. As early as 1789, they were fighting to have it abolished.

In 1854 the Democratic controlled Congress fought and passed a law expanding slavery called the Kansas-Nebraska act. This led to contention in our government and caused a split of the Democratic-Republican Party. One side- the Democrats fought hard to pass legislation to keep and expand slavery. Our Republicans fought harder to abolish it.

These things led Lincoln to take us to war, for the sake of abolishing the evil practice of slavery completely. The Democrats went on to fight AGAINST every civil rights legislation which we (the Republicans) fought hard to pass.

The 1864 Republican Platform gives us both reason and right as a party to drill for oil, since OPEC forces people into slavery. We should have NO MORE TO DO WITH THEM. It speaks of how the Republican government finds it detestable and shall not partake in anything advocating it. The Democrats platform just complains about the Republicans using the military to uphold fair elections, to keep pro-slavery (Democrats) people from acting out violently against those who oppose it (Republicans).

In 1868 the Democrats Platform actually accuses Republicans of fighting for "Negro supremacy" and they promised to fight against any further civil rights for blacks. The Republicans just declared sympathy for the opressed.

In 1872 the platforms- the Dems demanded amnesty to protect them from prosecution for the crimes against humanity perpetrated in the civil war. The Republicans platform was to emancipate 4 million slaves, give them citizenship and voting rights. In 1872- 87% of the Democrats voted against an equal education Bill for black Americans.

In 1876 the Democrats' platform was calling the Republicans unfair for fighting for the rights of blacks and they claim that it is NOT a majority in America that wanted their freedom. The Republicans' platform promised to purge the US of slavery and to fight for civil rights for blacks.

In 1880 the Republicans were sending military people to the places people voted to assure the safety of blacks who were trying to vote. The Democrats called it corruption?? Again the Republican platform spoke out against slavery.

In 1884 the Democrats of the South found a new way to be unfair to the blacks by creating the "Black Code" and only allowing them to partake in servile labor, making them less than a white man. The Republicans fought against this and tried to abolish the Black Code.

1888 and 1892 - The Republicans stay on track and promise to fight FOR equal rights. In 1892 the Democrats made basic proclamations of change, which were later evidenced as untrue.

In 1896 the Republican Party platform took a stand against lynching, which was still going on, despite the Republicans efforts to stop unequal treatment. The Democrats came out with a not so new civil rights cause- freedom of religion (already covered in the Constitution). It was later taken further to mean freedom FROM religion and morphed into a lie about the meaning of the Constitution (the false claims of Separation of Church and State).

In 1900 The Republican Party platform pertained to the 15th Amendment- against discrimination. The Democrats said nothing about civil rights that year, same as 1888. However, the years they said something- it was against civil rights.

In 1904, The Democrats' platform claimed that all racial inequality was healed at that point. WHAT?? The Republicans disagreed and demanded fair representation, so they could continue to fight for those rights.

From 1908-1936 The Democrats' platform made NO mention of race or civil rights. The Republicans came out again to fight for equal rights for blacks in 1908, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1932 and 1936. They also continued to try to pass legislation to stop the lynching in 1920, 1924 and 1928. Democrats at that time were against stiff criminal penalties for lynching and there was equal protection for a dog. In 1936 the Republicans were trying to pass laws for fair employment and safety rights for black Americans.

In 1940, Roosevelt, a Democrat pandered to black Americans and appointed blacks to his cabinet to advise him on race issues. Although, he did little for civil rights and didn't even introduce ONE civil rights Bill during his presidency. This was the start of the BIG LIE, where the Democrats showed themselves to be pro-civil-rights and actually did nothing for minorities. In 1940, The Republican platform was to promise a square deal and to enact civil service reform, making the military unbiased towards blacks.

The 1944 platforms were: The Democrats made a vague promise of civil rights for people of racial and religious minority. This would later have Democrats inferring to blacks that they are the same as people of quirky and sick religions, even Satanism. It was made to sound like they would lose their rights if they didn’t take a stand for these quirky civil rights causes being pandered by the liberals and it continues today with abortion and gay marriage. The Republicans were still fighting to get the Democrats to agree with them on legislation to penalize racists for lynching. Ironically, the Democrats at this time were coming out as THE party for civil rights, yet enacting no good legislation to protect blacks. The Republicans were still fighting AGAINST discrimination, segregation and unfair treatment of blacks, despite the liberals manipulating them into becoming Democrats every chance they got. Government had been making people pay a poll tax, so they could vote. With the state of the economy for blacks, thanks to the Democrats killing the legislation Republicans tried to pass, most blacks could not afford to vote. Republicans wanted to make voting EQUAL for ALL classes and possible for all blacks, so they tried to abolish the poll tax.

In 1948 the Democrats under Truman finally listened to the REPUBLICANS and enacted an anti-lynching law. The Republicans had tried and failed for decades, because of the Democrats in office. Truman also finally abolished the poll tax (for Federal elections) that Republicans were trying to abolish. Despite almost all of this new legislation being legislation the Republicans had been trying to pass for decades and being stonewalled by the Democrats, the Democrats still got credit for it. Again the Republicans platform was to protect civil rights and abolish segregation. Therefore, despite many Democrats voting against the new civil rights laws, these things were finally passed because of the Republicans voting for them.

In 1952 The Democrats platform was a very basic statement about upholding rights. The Republicans made a promise NOT to try to confuse or basically trick blacks into voting for them for the sake of political gain, because of what the Democrats had been doing. Republicans continued fighting for the true civil rights causes.

Like it or not, the average black person back then was uneducated due to the Democrats and their bigoted legislation. The Democrats took advantage of this, as you can see with all past legislations. This is still going on today. You would think that as the blacks were tricked into voting FOR the party that sought to destroy them, Republicans would stop fighting to help them, BUT they never have. The Democrats continue to be a party full of corruption and manipulation and they have MOST minorities EVEN Christians convinced that Republicans are hate-mongers. NOTHING is further from the truth!

In 1956 and 1960 Republicans were able to fight and pass laws to desegregate public areas, like parks and restaurants in D.C. and planned to further it around the entire nation. They were successful in beginning the desegregation of public schools. The Republicans also fought for fair housing laws making it possible for blacks to purchase equal homes in areas where they were not allowed to live before desegregation. They both had a platform FOR civil rights at that time. However, the Eisenhower (Republican) administration, with Nixon as VP did more for civil rights than ANY other administration. At this time black Americans began to excel and open businesses, get better educations and jobs, homes, etc. They were pulling themselves out of a historically bad situation.

In 1964 America was still reeling from the assassination of JFK. JFK was less willing than Eisenhower to use executive orders to promote civil rights. He made many promises of civil rights that he was unable to see through. He even delayed a promise to sign an executive order to continue to integrate public housing for two years. The prior Republican administration got it started, but was unable to see it through as they were not voted in the next election.  He also delayed a major civil rights bill until 1963, after a violent racially motivated incident. The bill was a result of the Eisenhower administrations 1957 findings, by his appointed Civil Rights Commission. Although Kennedy was a known philanderer, his promises of equality left the nation hoping that his unfulfilled legacy could continue. And death has always had a way of portraying people in a positive light. At this point in history, at least we can be glad that the last two Democratic administrations were willing to do a little for civil rights. Under the Johnson administration there would be two more -big civil rights bills passed. BOTH bills were passed thanks to the Republicans in Congress. There was not much support from the Democrats. By hard work and a century plus of fighting for the enfranchisement of blacks and minorities, Republicans could FINALLY say that their efforts weren’t in vane. The last century of disenfranchisement attempts by the Democrats had failed. Blacks finally had the same rights as whites. The only thing left was to help change the mindsets of the many separatists left in America.

As a result, the Democrats went on to falsely advertise themselves as the champions of civil rights!

They would soon take on causes that were evil and wrong, like abortion, affirmative action and gay marriage, falsely labeling them civil rights causes. They knew that Republicans were strict adherents to the Constitution and would not go for this, so they were able to call them bigots to confuse those who they always fought against. 

Soon we found ourselves in a country that no longer gives the right to life to babies and now the Democrats would fight again to put a covert burden on blacks that was ended by the Republicans. The early proponents for abortion discretely let it be known that abortion MUST be utilized as a method to keep down the population of blacks. They hired black preachers to lie to young black women about whether it is morally right. They were willing to risk the healthy white babies they would exterminate with their covert genocide. So they put an abortion clinic on every corner in the black neighborhoods and fought against laws that made young black men responsible for their children. They allowed and encouraged portrayals of blacks as sex-starved animals to be commonplace in music, television and other public forums.  The Democrats continue to fight for abortion and the Republicans knowing it for the evil it is, continue to fight against it.

The Democrats furthered the abortion legislations as Clinton passed a bill allowing Partial Birth Abortion, which allowed abortion up until the end of the 9th month of pregnancy.  Bush has been fighting against it since he took office.

The tool Democrats have used through Affirmative Action has caused racial unrest and an ideology of inferiority amongst blacks. It has been a powerful psychological tool keeping many whites now feeling slighted as the blacks used to and keeping many blacks feeling like they can’t make it without handouts. It spreads a message of unfairness and inequality in a time when it is now proven that we can be equals intellectually. They have also left fewer blacks wanting to achieve equality in education, due to a fear of inferiority. If you tell a person they can’t do something without help long enough, they will believe you. This causes MOST of the racial unrest that remains in this country.
 
Don't miss the links in red!
 
God Bless you and God Bless America!
 
Please pray for the people of this nation to wake up and see the skunk in the rose garden, before it sprays us all!
 
The Ice Princess
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Billy Carter for VP

Posted by The Ice Princess on Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:46:55 PM

 

Billy Carter for VP
 

I think Obama should take Jimmy Carter on as his General Elections Campaign Leader. Carter can teach ANY Democrat “How to lose an election by a landslide”. Now that’s what the Christians in this nation should spend our time fasting and praying for. Jimmy Carter just recently came out by saying that Obama would be making a grievous mistake by putting Hillary on his ticket as VP. You go old man! You tell him! This is a great thing and I am praying now and will be celebrating when the official announcement is made by Obama - saying "I regret to announce that despite Mrs. Clinton being a great friend, she’s not my choice as Vice-President. It was a tough decision but the Vice-Presidential Candidate is: Billy Carter." Now that would make it easy for me to question the VP’s credibility. Is he still alive or has the cirrhosis taken him already? Hey, with enough people praying, you never know what kind of a miracle could happen.

All of the Obamaniacs are saying the same thing “It would be a big mistake if you put Hillary on your ticket as VP.”  As far as- who would actually be running the White House if he chose her, I can see the mistake. However, if he chose her, they'd together be able to get the majority of the leftist vote. I agree that with her as Vice-President, it wouldn't be worth winning the White House. Has anybody forgotten that she was already president for 8 years?

Speaking of Obamaniacs, last night I learned that Jay Leno is a sadistic idiot, when he had the magnificent, witty and kind Conservative man- Jeff Foxworthy on. He barely gave him any time to speak. Jeff is now under contract with “Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader”, meaning that he cannot speak out openly and aggressively about his political beliefs. Leno had another guest come out. It was a well-known LIBERAL writer who I won’t even name, because I won’t give her the credibility. You could see Fox’s face melt with an inexpressible resentment as he adjusted his seating over away from the edge of the second seat, so he didn’t have to be too close to her. You know what Jay, you just lost a viewer. It was already difficult to see you drooling with love for Obama, but this was wrong, after always claiming to be a social Conservative. Your ratings game worked against you.

This liberal creaton who doesn’t even speak good English, touched the Fox without his permission and made reference to red-necks. She said “If you went out into rural West Virginia with an Obama shirt on…” He interrupted “I’d probably be strung up.” I was thrilled. She made a few references to how Obama would be best served if Jeff would be VP and said that he was considering an anti-war Republican. I stopped watching and don’t know who she mentioned, but wow! Far RIGHT Conservatives be warned- a wolf in sheep’s clothing is NO sheep. A wolf in sheep’s clothing is worse than a wolf. It is a devious manipulative wolf. God protect us from those who don’t get it. She also said that Obama would be making a big mistake by putting Hillary on his ticket.

Back to the liberal voters- if he doesn’t take Hillary on as VP, he will be splitting the party. That, my Conservative brothers and sisters is what we want, unless of course he chooses a RINO in good ole boy’s clothing on the ticket. Then we will need to worry about him taking the Conservative-minded folks who don’t have a clue unless Rush or Newt say it, since they’ve relentlessly attacked McCain. They will be the dangerous one’s then.

NOBODY should ever vote without researching the voting records and investigating the issues. This country is in sad shape because of it happening so much. If you are new to the voting world and only know what you hear click here. BUT also be aware that IF you are close to two Candidates that there has NEVER been a 3rd Party and you should pick between the two actually running, by the MOST important of your ideals and also realize that it should NOT be all about you. It should be about strengthening a nation in its entirety. If this nation falls apart, so will your little world.

As for all of the attacks on McCain, MOST of them are misguided and spewing about as many venomous lies as something written by liberals. Has everybody forgotten the terrorists who want this nation bowing to Mecca with them 5 times a day or beheaded? That is a place where NO other candidate would do, but McCain, who is an 80% Conservative, just making him a Conservative, NOT a RINO, NOT a Moderate. People like Bob Barr, who essentially have NO past and rarely make it out to vote on the important issues, fall into a dangerous group of people who want to pull our troops from Iraq. Conservatives- look at the bright side: With people like Carter advising Obama, we actually have a shot at this election, despite ourselves.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Second Coming of Ross Perot

Posted by The Ice Princess on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:29:31 PM
 

The Second Coming of Ross Perot

 

Or is it possibly the second coming of Pat Robertson?

Don't forget, Pat showed his true colors this election cycle, by backing Giuliani. Hopefully Conservatives will see through the instant replay of 1992, before it’s too late.

What am I talking about?

I’m talking about Bob Barr, who is supposedly the Great White Hope of the far Right Conservatives. Ironically, my research into him took MUCH less time than my research of McCain. It seems that he only votes on a few issues here and there, leaving the majority of issues up to the old school people. Kennedy is an old school Senator. There are many Kennedys in Congress with other names.

Now, fellow Conservatives looking for a 3rd Party miracle pulled out of the rear of your new “Great White Hope”, check this out:

With all of Barr’s 2 ½ tallied votes, he rates 80% on fiscal Conservative issues. Okay- 2 ½ is a slight exaggeration, but you get my point. Do you know where McCain rates after multitudes of votes? You got it- 80% on all issues. There goes Barr’s new title as the Great White Conservative hope. I admit, he has never lost a point on social issues, but he has also rarely voted on them.

Does anybody want to know why the rebirth of Perot/ Robertson rates so low?

He wants to pull our troops from Iraq. Yes, on the issue of war, he is another Ron Paul. He is a separatist nut-job. He basically doesn’t care that 9/11 has brought the war to our soil. He doesn’t care about the threats to our country that are brewing abroad. He doesn’t care how many of our young men and women have died for the cause of peace. He wants us to pull out and stay out of it. All of that with so few votes in his docket that we have no idea where he truly stands, except that he rarely bothers to stand up and vote. With all of the recent abortion legislation, his last vote on the issue was in 2001. That makes me sick! While I admit, I haven’t researched his private life, to see if maybe he has been ill and out of commission for the last 7 years with all of the missed pro-life votes, I have researched his voting record (as short as it is). That voting record shows voting, although minimal, during those 7 years.

Ask yourself folks; is that what we need in a president?

Not that he has a miniscule chance of obtaining the oval office, but he can certainly get in the way of a McCain victory over whatever evil-doer wins the Democratic nomination.

Let me see, do I want a war hero or a cut-n-run kid in the oval office when we are at war?

For those who haven’t read my prior articles related to 3rd party politics:

Why do I say that he is the rebirth of Ross or Pat?

Because: With nearly no political voting history to hold him accountable, he is waging a war of dissension on the GOP. He is splitting the GOP vote, just as Robertson/ Perot did for George H. W. Bush. It has ALWAYS been unsuccessful throughout history to attempt this, that is, if you are a Republican. When Republicans do this throughout history, it ALWAYS lands the Democrats in the oval office. This time, the Democrats are more evil than ever in history.

This leads me to ask:

Who is funding the Barr for President Campaign?

Maybe it’s the DNC through a modicum of dummy names?

Wake up and get on the straight-talk express or you’ll cause our nation a great big mess.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IF Obama is elected

Posted by The Ice Princess on Monday, May 12, 2008 5:39:13 PM
Some wonderful things we COULD look forward to, IF Obama is elected:

We've already established that it just doesn't make sense how Obama could be a Christian, due to the Shari'a Law rules of Apostasy– that is, punishments such as killing the apostate (a Muslim who converts to another religion). Since he's had no threat of death that we've heard of and since his "church" allows Muslims to attend, become members and keep their Muslim faith, we can assume he is a Muslim. 
 
A Muslim cannot hold public office and avoid forcing their religion on others like a Christian can. It is a law of the religion, which supersedes any laws of the land when a Muslim is in office.
 
Where would you be IF judged by these laws?
 
REAL examples of Islamic shari'a laws:
 
1) Amputating a thief's hand (no matter the age or value of the stolen item(s)
2) Cutting off a brigand's opposing hand and foot.
3) Stoning the adulterer to death (likely just the female ones, but it doesn't specify)
4) Publicly flogging wine drinkers (YES- people who drink wine)
5) Killing homosexuals by throwing them from a high place (How funny is it that MOST homosexuals are Democrats- many for Obama)
6) Allowing a relative of a [murder] victim to deal with the murderer, instead of the state.
    (That one I don't mind too much, but I don't want to be judged by their courts.)
  
Islamic shari'a laws regarding personal status:
   
1) Permit polygamy for citizens, and not punish them for it.
2) Permit citizens to beat their wives to discipline them, as the Koran urges.
3) Allow men to unilaterally decide to divorce without requiring any court proceedings, as this is a right guaranteed [to men] by shari'a;
4) Give daughters [only] half the inheritance rights that sons have, while widows receive only an eighth of the inheritance.  
5) Not consider women's testimony the equal of men's in courts.
6) Deprive a divorced woman of custody of her children if she remarries, ever.
7) Allow Muslim citizens to marry in traditional marriages without the need to officially register these marriages.
8) Eliminate adoption, since it is contrary to shari'a.
9) Force a woman whose Muslim husband converts to another religion to divorce him, because he is an apostate.  
10) Prevent Muslim women from marrying non-Muslims.
 
In London, they are currently SERIOUSLY considering implementing shari'a law for Muslim citizens.
 
Thanks to the war, there is at least one place in the middle-East that doesn't judge by these horrible laws!
 
Would you want to be a woman in a country with those laws?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cold, Hard Facts About Illegal Immigration:

Posted by The Ice Princess on Monday, May 12, 2008 5:33:20 PM
Why aren't we disgusted?
 
MOST of us (legal U.S. citizens) are against illegal immigration and want a serious reform before we lose our country. The future of our nation is at stake! This is NOT a race issue, like the bleeding hearts would lead us to believe. Race is absolutely irrelevant to me, if you are here legally. If you are here illegally, you are a criminal. IT IS CRIMINAL TO STEAL IDs and ID theft is almost impossible to do without if you live here illegally. Do you truly believe that IF somebody steals your ID they will ONLY use it to work and not cause you financial difficulties? If so, I'm sorry, but you are naïve or stupid! Not to mention, there are about 9,000 Americans MURDERED per year by illegals. One or more of every thirty illegal aliens has deportation orders that cannot be carried out, since they cannot be found. These orders are due to criminal activity. These are ONLY the ones that have been caught in a crime.  
 
You hear the Democrats screaming about the American deaths in Iraq, but they unanimously vote in a way that increases illegal immigration. We have DRASTICALLY LESS deaths of Americans in Iraq than we have at the hands of illegals. However, when you go to war, you are a hero, dying for our country. When you are killed by an illegal, you are simply an ignored statistic, shunned by Democrats as if it never happened. Ironically it is costing us more to play all-too-gracious host to these criminals than it is to liberate Iraq. In L.A., 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder (1,200 to 1,500) are for illegal aliens. Why so many? Because the lack of legal registration in our country makes them impossible to track or find.
 
We must stop all of the illegal immigration and return the ones here to Mexico, with our votes in the general election. There is NO REASON to immigrate illegally in a country like the U.S. When somebody does choose to come here illegally, it is usually because: They are convicted felons with no right to leave their country (and we don't need any more criminals); They are wanted in Mexico or the U.S. for other crimes; They don't want to be here legally, because of a lack of intent to follow our laws; They have a contagious disease; They are drug-addicts; OR: They have family members that fit one or all of the prior three. Those are the things that restrict them from getting a green card and applying for citizenship.
 
Contrary to liberal beliefs, illegal immigrants DO NOT PAY INCOME TAXES. There is no way they can pay income taxes without a STOLEN IDENTITY. If they chose to pay taxes with their stolen identity, they would be at risk of being caught and deported. They do not own homes, meaning they do not pay property taxes. In many cases, they live fifty to a small home, which doesn't help the rental market. These homes are often destroyed without any punishment. There is no way to track somebody who isn't registered. They cannot register a vehicle, have a driver's license or insurance in most states and WE pay for it in our insurance prices. When they get pulled over and receive a ticket, they don't need to pay it, because technically they don't exist. They clog our emergency rooms, receiving health care for viruses or small issues, at emergency room prices and never have to pay. Who does pay? Our healthcare costs go up. Our insurance prices go up. Our waiting time goes up. Many (somehow) get food stamps, Medicaid and other welfare. In turn they siphon tax dollars, jobs and other revenue from our system without paying back. They are here COMPLETELY without accountability!
 
My children go to school five days a week for an inferior education, due to the children who are brought here illegally. Their parents are criminals and it is obvious that a criminal's child(ren) usually doesn't understand right from wrong, because their parents don't teach them. The more illegals at your child's school, the more packed their classes will be, the more need for special education programs there will be, the more free lunches there will be, etc., etc. and all without a dime going into the schools from their parents. Have you checked your children's credit scores lately? Of course not. How would they have credit scores as children? Well, in AZ alone there have been more than 1.1 million identities stolen from American children. How do you think this affects us?
 
Many Americans will cry foul on America, claiming that we stole TX, AZ, NM, CA and parts of other states from Mexico. In reality, we acquired these states shortly after Mexico obtained it's freedom from Spain. At that point, Texas decided to secede from Mexico and become a part of America. Mexico waged war on the U.S. To end the war, Mexico offered to sell that territory to America for $15 million. America later bought a small strip of land from Mexico (that they were told they already owned in the first agreement) for $50 million dollars. $65 million for these pieces of land was a LOT of money then. Now many Mexican gang-bangers want to take it back. We live in fear of their violence. We are afraid to speak out in public; making us appear to be the minority in thinking "We must take back our nation!"
 
BEFORE YOU VOTE, find out how the candidates will handle illegal immigration.
 
How has McCain been doing to increase jobs for AMERICANS and decrease ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? CLICK LINK:
 
And how about Hillary? (ANY GUESSES?) CLICK LINK: http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=AZ&VIPID=33
 
And how is Obama's Report Card on immigration WHEN he CHOOSES to VOTE? CLICK LINK:  http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=IL&VIPID=1162
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

1992 all over again

Posted by The Ice Princess on Monday, May 12, 2008 2:29:20 PM
1992 all over again
 

Every president in history has spoken somewhere or to someone that shocks us all. We don't know why they do it. Maybe some campaign manager was misguided and thinks it's a good idea? Every president has done something that would make us sick, EVEN Reagan. Many of Reagan’s mistakes, like immigration, are the same mistakes McCain has made. McCain is still a war hero and basically he does things with a conscience. Reagan left the economy a mess, due to things like the star wars program. You never hear about that. The reason you don't is likely because he was charismatic, just like Bill Clinton and the left never comments on Clinton's mistakes.

What scares me and makes me want to cry is that most of the GOP is just trading McCain insults in groups like this and NOT writing these things to him, with a warning that what is happening now is almost identical to what happened to Bush 1, when Clinton won. McCain is a good person and will do his best to please the right, if a large majority bothers to let him know directly what makes them unhappy.
 
 
In the Bush1 generation, the right became too righteous and jumped on the Perot or Robertson bandwagon, in lieu of Newt's complaints, totally ignoring what good Bush did: fixing the economic crisis DESPITE the Democrat majority in the houses (Clinton jumped in and milked our military for money. Then took credit for balancing the budget); Bush ended the cold war; Facilitated the fall of the Berlin wall (Reagan got credit for both. He started the ball rolling, but a Democrat would have popped it); Bush liberated Kuwait from Iraq, with nearly no casualties, etc... The same is happening with McCain right now. That 1992 mistake predisposed us to 9/11, because our military was virtually non-existent and Clinton let Osama go.
 
McCain is being ripped to shreds, just like Bush 1 was and many of the things he is being bullied for are things that Reagan did too. He has powerful people beating him to death and quite honestly I think he's the ONLY one of the presidential candidates that had even a modicum of a chance of a large enough majority to beat the Democrats in 2008.
 
Think back! We are on the same road. As a matter of fact, right now with Bush's low approval rating, THE ONLY way of winning this is by winning the fence sitters, Reagan Democrats and getting near 100% of the GOP vote. We have multitudes of new voters being wooed by the left successfully.
 
No matter what McCain does or has done it will not even be close to what we will have in store for us if we get the Muslim or the wicked witch.
 
PLEASE- Good or Bad, disconcerted or enchanted, no matter how you feel about McCain, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE come together, fight for him and spread the positive, unless you really truly think we can make it through 4 years of a Democrat. THAT IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN if the negative keeps spreading. Also, pray for our GOP daily. If enough people bother, it will help.
 

God Bless!

The Ice Princess (Tina)
 

If you do better with analogies: I was not a big fan of Bush 1, but I saw it as somebody I could tolerate. He wasn’t terrible, just not perfect. I looked at him as if a relative I was close to was dating somebody who wasn’t good enough for them and I knew they’d eventually break up and meet a better, more suited person to date. You know that when somebody you care about is dating somebody you aren’t fond of, it doesn’t help matters to belittle them, especially making them sound worse than they are. It definitely doesn’t help to have an entire family of self-righteous people, whose decisions are likely no better than the person they are cutting down, belittling them terribly. That person may just surprise you, if you don’t build them as a tyrant in your mind and belittle them to a point of no return. The results of that are typically causing unnecessary problems and often that relative will rebel and end up in a long term relationship with a very bad person. Our favorite relative: Lady Liberty has 3 potential suitors and our negativity can make the best possibility into an impossibility. With a long term relationship with one of the other two, Lady Liberty may just fall apart and never end up in a good relationship. Encourage her best suitor to be a better person and he may just surprise you and be the best one ever.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and any other egotistical far right Conservative who claims to be concerned with what’s best for this nation

Posted by The Ice Princess on Thursday, May 08, 2008 5:00:00 PM

 

To Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and any other egotistical far right Conservative who claims to be concerned with what’s best for this nation:

It’s wake up time! As a fellow far right Christian Conservative, I say it’s time to support McCain or shut up! No, really, I love you, but put a sock in it- FOR God’s sake (literally). I have always shared most of your views and enjoyed your talents, but I haven’t even been willing to read your columns or buy any new books lately, due to you’re my way or the highway views. I am a representative of that grassroots base that makes you money and I am not alone in my views. I just happen to voice them louder.

These elections are so obviously becoming a repeat of the 1992 elections. In 1992 we had a Moderate Republican in office who accomplished MUCH MORE than, even I ever gave him credit for. He was replaced with this nation’s first completely immoral president, due to the far Right Conservatives and their ‘Moderate no more’ attitudes. Certainly, we’ve had liberal idiots before Clinton, like Carter for example. However, Clinton took the immoral cake and that was thanks to the righteous speeches from the far Right and the idiocy of Perot. That election was essentially given to the left by Newt (yes, I [a far Right Conservative] insulted Newt), Robertson (proclaimed Christian, who actually supported the Right’s most liberal, pro-choice candidate- Giuliani) and of course H. Ross Perot (proclaimed friend of Bush).

Now for the 2008 election cycle, we have far Right Conservatives who are well known, like the aforementioned who want to tear McCain to shreds for a 20% liberal record. Does this sound familiar? Funny! I think I heard something similar before, like in 1992. So, over a 20% liberal record, we will take a 0% Conservative who will leave some of us bankrupt and a nation morally bankrupt.

Before anybody bothers to try to rip me to shreds, like they do McCain, just know that I have spent at least 48 hours of my time, when you add it up, researching every vote and every issue McCain has voted on. Not to mention, all of the other time researching the official voting records of other potentials and the time writing to fight for our GOP to have a chance in `08, whether it has to tone down a bit or not. If you can’t say the same, you can shut up too. No offense to my fellow Conservative, but I’m tired of your far Right views flushing my nation down the proverbial Clinton toilet!

I heard this nation speaking, beginning in `04 and shouting now that they want change and it is up to the far Right just how much change we get. Are we going to get a Mildly Conservative Republican; are we going to get the worse of the two Clintons; or are we going to get a Muslim who has us all bowing to Mecca 5 times a day? Your choice folks and even Newt is saying we can’t win this with just attacks on the left. We have to turn this campaign positive!

Personally, I have been fighting for the far Right as long as I can remember. BUT, the fight for the far Right is over for now folks! There is NO far Right in the 2008 election cycle. Therefore continuing to beat your chest and fight for the far Right will make this nation take a u-turn and head left before you know what happened. Obviously I am one of the few who learned from the 1992 mistakes. Your egos are not worth the outcome. Your disappointments and threats of a 1992 style rebellion would be best suited in letters and opinions expressed directly to our only shot at `08, like it or not- McCain.

If you can climb over your egos, you’ll see that many of the McCstakes made throughout his McCareer are the same mistakes made by Reagan. I know, I know, it is a sin to speak ill of Reagan. He was my favorite president too. I cried when he died too, but he was no more a human than McCain. He started out as a Democrat, don’t forget! McCain has always been a Republican. AND, does anybody remember where amnesty came from? Do your research!

In the spirit of all Moms’ of our generation, “If you don’t have anything nice to say about McCain, don’t say anything at all.”

In the words of my Mom, “Someday when I meet my maker, at least I can say I tried.” Can you? Think about it before you help fast forward us to the day he comes.

God Bless you all and may God forgive our haughtiness before the elections!

The Ice Princess

(Tina)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »